Karrinyup residents flood town rooms furious over blueprint of 24-story apartment tower


According to them, in accordance with the state planning policy, a business center plan or a structural plan should have been prepared for the entire site of the shopping center and its surroundings, taking into account residential codes, height of buildings and a downward transition between high density apartment areas and low density areas. -density of single-family homes.

The city initially recommended that the 2015 proposal be rejected due to the incomplete completion of this activity center plan, but the Joint Development Assessment Committee approved it due to exceptional economic circumstances.

They said all images shown of apartments offered between 2015 and mid-2020 showed two eight-story buildings and one four-story.

An artist’s view of development.Credit:Hames sharley

Group spokesperson Lynnette Noack lives right across from one of the proposed towers on Burroughs Street.

“A nine, 15 and 24 story development in a family suburb overlooking single family homes is inappropriate and does not match its character,” she said.

“It’s not near the beach, town or a university. It’s the northern suburbs and it’s totally out of place and we’re totally against it.

“This is exactly what AMP [Capital] would have found out if they had bothered to chat with us.

She said she had not received any consultation on the proposal – not a letter, a call, a visit or an email.

“Consultation is dialogue,” she said. “You are supposed to work together. “

It is the job of the City of Stirling to gather public comment, assess the proposal against local planning rules and provide a report and recommendations to the decision maker of the Joint Development Assessment Committee.

Artist's impression.

Artist’s impression.Credit:Hames sharley

The city has placed notices on the city’s public comment portal claiming three times on the same webpage – twice in bold, when underlined – that it is not the development decision maker.

The Perth Rowe Group planning firm, which filed the plans on behalf of owners AMP Capital and UniSuper, has been approached for comment.

Its application indicates that the height reflects a center undergoing a significant transition to provide a greater variety of uses.


“The City of Stirling Design Review Committee found the proposed building heights to be appropriate for this center,” he said.

“The site and the buildings are considered a landmark. The number of accommodations within the activity center should be maximized.

“This building height is necessary to ensure that the correct density is finally achieved in the central core of the Karrinyup center, while preserving the future commercial non-commercial development of the land.

“The proposal is located on the part of the site where any midday eclipse or overhang is minimized.”

Stirling City Mayor Mark Irwin said the city and council welcomed the opportunity to hear from voters in an open forum, which was conducted in a respectful manner.

The group had put forward seven motions that Council would consider at its March 30 meeting.

Mayor Irwin said the city announced the request in accordance with city procedure and state planning regulations.

As part of this procedure, the City made the plans available on its website and posted letters
posted to all owners and occupants within 200 meters of the site. The applicant also installed several signs of 5 square meters on the site for 21 days.

Given the scope of the request, the City had in fact gone further than necessary.

“In anticipation of the interest of the community, the City has proactively extended the advertising period by one week, bringing the total advertising period to 28 days,” he said.

“The City has also created a dedicated project page on our website, with additional information beyond the development plans to help residents better understand the proposal and encourage them to submit. The City has opened an online survey, which allows people to
leave feedback in a timely manner.

City staff reviewed the 748 public submissions received on the plans when writing their report.

It was likely that Council would also consider the City staff report on the development on March 30, although this is subject to change.

After consideration by Council, the application would be reviewed and determined by the Metro Inner-North JDAP.


Comments are closed.